Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75065
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9A3A1383-B237-46FE-977B-A191A76C650A@heroku.com>
References: <035C7115-6871-4FC6-802E-464FD48070EF@heroku.com>
	<CAH-PCH4TWkYUE3EN8JmLByVZB-Y3OB1b5izeYGtJXbgBNBN2dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUwpuTerXZb68mqbzRDeozgnW-BOauamsVmFfn6cJMxQ5PJGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6QG6Si9oetv29Ot_uXmCmmQynE4=vb--oA1QBGqSM7CA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1C110716-6C9D-4EB8-97BA-2CEABE2C4847@heroku.com>
	<5A82BEA2-7D25-46B8-BFFF-6EB368B46190@heroku.com>
	<9A3A1383-B237-46FE-977B-A191A76C650A@heroku.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:55:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH6SNmm1=7oJ8H_+h+qouCC3F=cF3TKCfHydZkRaoR49og@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Zuelke <dz@heroku.com>, julien pauli <jpauli@php.net>
Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org>, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, 
	Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133bb5868145204fc9cda4e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fixing (and making easier) Apache mod_proxy_fcgi with PHP-FPM
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001a1133bb5868145204fc9cda4e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Julien, do you have any problem merging this PR to PHP-5.5(and merging
upwards) so it can be released with 5.5.15 (and with 5.6.0RC2)?

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:15 AM, <dz@heroku.com> wrote:

> The change is now in Apache 2.4.x (
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D1604378) and they=
're
> planning a release soon:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.devel/53822
>
> Can someone please at least merge the pull request? Would be a shame IMO
> if this didn't make it into 5.6.0.
>
> I'll gladly provide docs for this, too.
>
> David
>
>
> On 20.06.2014, at 07:11, dz@heroku.com wrote:
>
> > Bump?
> >
> > We've been running http://github.com/php/php-src/pull/694 in production
> at Heroku for a while now, with no issues.
> >
> > I really think this should be in 5.6, too. It'll make setting up PHP-FP=
M
> so much less painful on Apache once their new release is out.
> >
> > And if someone could also please review and commit
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D65641 (or find a better way; I'll be gl=
ad
> to help with anything like setting up Apache accordingly etc), then even
> with current versions of Apache, PHP will finally work fine. Currently,
> quite a few frameworks etc that use (or rewrite to) PATH_INFO are plainly
> broken.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > On 17.06.2014, at 14:33, David Zuelke <dz@heroku.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 13.06.2014, at 17:19, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could we still squeeze this fix into 5.2.14? I know you just rolle=
d
> RC1
> >>>>>> (while I was fiddling with this stuff), but it would be so, so hug=
e
> to have
> >>>>>> this in=E2=80=A6 or at least in 5.2.15.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just to prevent confusion, you meant 5.5.14 and 5.5.15 here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Obviously 5.5.X yes.
> >>>>
> >>>> I myself answered that I dont see any criticity to roll out an RC2 f=
or
> >>>> 5.5.14, just for this specific bug.
> >>>> I think it can go to 5.5.15 or any version as far as the patch is
> >>>> tested and merged up.
> >>>
> >>> Given the security issues fixes waiting to be released, I would not
> >>> delay the releases any longer.
> >>
> >> So, who wants to merge the PR? :)
> >>
> >> And if someone could review and possibly apply any of the
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D65641 attachments that'd be great too,
> although I suspect that it's possible to fix the problem way further up i=
n
> the code so that this stripping of stuff isn't even necessary at such a
> "late" stage.
> >>
> >> With those two out of the way, PHP-FPM and Apache will be a lot, lot
> easier to set up together. One bit of config, done.
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> P.S. would be great for 5.4 too I think, not just 5.5+!
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>


--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--001a1133bb5868145204fc9cda4e--