Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75047 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28914 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2014 09:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jun 2014 09:16:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@beccati.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@beccati.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain beccati.com designates 176.9.114.167 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@beccati.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 176.9.114.167 spritz.beccati.com Received: from [176.9.114.167] ([176.9.114.167:50158] helo=mail.beccati.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/92-14743-D50F7A35 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:16:15 -0400 Received: (qmail 24060 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2014 09:16:09 -0000 Received: from home.beccati.com (HELO ?192.168.1.202?) (88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2014 09:16:09 -0000 Message-ID: <53A7F056.8000402@beccati.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:16:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julien Pauli , Stas Malyshev CC: Ferenc Kovacs , Sebastian Bergmann , Remi Collet , PHP Internals References: <53A1C722.9060501@fedoraproject.org> <53A21137.6010705@sugarcrm.com> <53A2A9BD.1070603@sugarcrm.com> <53A3874E.20704@sugarcrm.com> <53A65578.6000701@sugarcrm.com> <53A772D0.3010404@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug 67072 resolution for 5.4/5.5 From: php@beccati.com (Matteo Beccati) Hi Julien, On 23/06/2014 09:54, Julien Pauli wrote: > I'm also ok for the 5.6 statements : > - Disalow O: for classes with custom serializer > - Unlock newInstanceArgWithoutConstructor() for internal classes > > Note that unlocking newInstanceArgWithoutConstructor() for internal > classes may require lot of work. > Remi already tried to patch some extensions for them to work AFAIR. With 5.6.0 being RC1 already, would someone have time and be willing to commit doing all the work required without delaying the stable release? I'm not entirely sure, but I certainly hope I'm wrong. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/