Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75028 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9993 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2014 19:42:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2014 19:42:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:47495] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/20-06324-B10E5A35 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:42:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA8E20008B; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:42:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id G753JzYS-FOf; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (unknown [90.210.122.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5AE120008F; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:42:12 +0100 Cc: PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <469CC1CB-D16B-46AF-B65D-48C6312741CF@ajf.me> References: To: Nikita Popov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Subject: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] (restart) Bare Name Array Literal/Dereference From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Good evening, Looks like I made a mistake when I created the voting widgets for the = RFCs: On 20 Jun 2014, at 15:32, Nikita Popov wrote: > Hey Andrea! >=20 > It seems like you have reused the same vote for both RFCs. Could you = please separate them? >=20 > Nikita I had no idea the vote title had actual importance. They now both have = different titles. (Side note: That explains the identical vote patterns, = I suppose.) As a result the votes are restarted for both, and will now both end on = 2014-06-28. I=92m really sorry to make you all go through the hassle of = voting again. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/bare_name_array_literal#vote https://wiki.php.net/rfc/bare_name_array_dereference#vote By the way, the literal RFC was updated to note the implications for = named parameters, were they to happen. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/