Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74998
Return-Path: <devosc@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49117 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2014 17:58:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jun 2014 17:58:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=devosc@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=devosc@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.52 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: devosc@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.52 mail-oa0-f52.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.219.52] ([209.85.219.52:57173] helo=mail-oa0-f52.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 92/22-37650-DD423A35 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:58:53 -0400
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id j17so5953224oag.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=t6aK8QL6+fEAw6/0Vumcr+s6VG5ibe/RwSgBsTphbOY=;
        b=o9/SL2tlw+nh8gViPeC17pvXoL+dbM7yNQolK87lkqAIFqw164/kAYUJBC3PwPeHVm
         TZINHwBtFjtDIzLiCze6sFrhF+uelX7hQOD//kVF57wcPAzw/g3rn/855+OPxbzV1Qym
         P9JPfnlS3aYbdTfQ1mjsPw1hpA5r9YNywyM6jfRPW0oJLqAMbUbMVu++tP3ehAR19Zf1
         LnZvczKbQnGiST6uE5tsqOZ8ERNsHH4SWK7iK8p6acM2EayXSc4OrWjhncI5qehqhX9E
         kmkIxZAaWcd5ybBCRChlhlb3jzZO/gaRCrHFul8t7pcvPyPfMfyGz0TYCO+VGyyBsM8K
         Ic0Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.121.170 with SMTP id ll10mr6277136obb.58.1403200730660;
 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.196.8 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMps_Dy5O7vDgfbBHPtEVJuhQ-WVi-1wQF=ubRf6zKr9EnNX6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMps_DzGPugHb057icpDFoSuXUxViHN5dqH8-jvbuKzBN=4PiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMps_DwertFZmYJUbvg9SfgXve7N9jS7q6GJMK8LaZWmvPvUag@mail.gmail.com>
	<53A0CD95.1020503@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAMps_DxL0BD+G_z0NQ1q3voSXv06z9LrhZAHnc=5gfScKZKv-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMps_Dy5O7vDgfbBHPtEVJuhQ-WVi-1wQF=ubRf6zKr9EnNX6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:58:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMps_DzLjmExt1WBTEKa23LthJmcaki+pR0LwewLozjopm9L8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: class names with and without opcache
From: devosc@gmail.com (Greg)

Ocramius suggested using travis to demonstrate the problem

https://travis-ci.org/devosc/opcache_disabled_test/jobs/27976956

The first script call (line 27) with opcache enabled does not have any
errors. However when it is disabled (line 30), it fails.

Question is, can this functionality be relied on? And which
functionality is that, the one with opcache enabled?