Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74991 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29013 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2014 14:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jun 2014 14:53:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=devosc@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=devosc@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: devosc@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.50 mail-oa0-f50.google.com Received: from [209.85.219.50] ([209.85.219.50:37290] helo=mail-oa0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FB/45-30767-679F2A35 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:53:43 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so5462728oag.9 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:53:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=M90OF7wm8LvEJwQXUrcytdMv74a4poD1Lpl7IcVvNlA=; b=BPlkDjsFbhHkappewj2v0x58kwStWwKAPOCY3sc4DY5D6e/xkCWh+jnqHX8AyNofaR 3yWsb2GUXUgpvy0RLUws+5S2gHKhtn3Vw8JaVNs+19UlyW+/YYI+Uzx1Yms7uJeuW/Jo pxJG5I/RGFQCTNLfiK5AfWfeme3ZLaKHVk3KY6QwmG0mMtPOCiTCw+a8guP6hgrQXFB1 ZmPxOn9PE6DbN3LgUpOaZAtuvP6crAN/rAn4Xl0vPPQRniHqHRZwIIKbfptchk0uw+Z2 tOzxrD3eVMfVYLvnMbEWsEI9DXO08wWstgt+JfsfuhF7Llh3OZiy8kBxjN8euKOwfu3Z eBJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.65.229 with SMTP id a5mr4981676oet.45.1403189619679; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.196.8 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:53:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53A0CD95.1020503@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: class names with and without opcache From: devosc@gmail.com (Greg) I've uploaded some sample code. https://github.com/devosc/opcache_disabled_test I'd appreciate it if someone could confirm whether this is a problem because it may not be possible to use 5.5 with opcache enabled (cli unit tests will be broken). On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Greg wrote: > Hi Stas, > > > Thank you, I appreciate this. I've uploaded some sample files to > github, it uses composer as the autoloader > > https://github.com/devosc/opcache_disabled_test > > Even if I am wrong in my implementation, there should not be any > difference/errors when opcache is disabled. > > I actually prefer the improvements provided by opcache since we don't > have to come up with weird aliases like BaseConfigInterface. > > > Regards, > > > Greg > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> Sorry to bug you, but I'd like to know if the problem I'm experiencing >>> with opcache and 5.5 is just my end or if this is a problem for >>> everybody. Could you let me know? Below is my original message to the >>> mailing list. >> >> I didn't have time to look into it yet, but I'll try to look - most >> likely on the weekend, if nobody beats me to it. >> -- >> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect >> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >> (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > > > -- > Greg -- Greg