Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74963 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57608 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2014 21:31:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jun 2014 21:31:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.91 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.91 smtp91.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.91] ([108.166.43.91:44424] helo=smtp91.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E0/72-43470-793B0A35 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:31:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 301E780313; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:31:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp12.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 7C9688027B; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:30:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53A0B392.50705@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:30:58 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Ferenc Kovacs , Rafael Dohms , Marco Pivetta , Remi Collet , internals References: <53886F73.70402@php.net> <539B0888.9040208@fedoraproject.org> <53A0A71E.9020503@sugarcrm.com> <53A0B251.2060508@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC break in 5.4.29 and 5.5.13 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > you need both, and it is painful. It may be, but denying functionality because it's hard to ensure forward compatibility is not a good way to go. If you need these checks, you need this functionality, so delaying it for a year won't do good. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227