Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74755 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88987 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2014 12:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2014 12:55:56 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 178.235.226.57 178235226057.olsztyn.vectranet.pl Received: from [178.235.226.57] ([178.235.226.57:29128] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8C/E0-17294-AD860935 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:55:55 -0400 Message-ID: <8C.E0.17294.AD860935@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:55:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 178.235.226.57 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tests code coverage for php 5.5 From: sobak@php.net (Maciej Sobaczewski) > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Nicolai Scheer > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> looking for tasks to invest a little spare time in the weeks to come I had >> a look at >> >> http://gcov.php.net/viewer.php?version=PHP_5_5 >> >> The test coverage is suspiciously low... >> >> Test coverage of 5.4 is quite high, so is coverage for 5.3. >> >> I would have guessed, that for a new major php version all tests from the >> previous version are reused, and fixed if needed. >> >> Looking at the 5.5 source tree all the phpt files seem in place... Aren't >> the tests just currently not executed on gcov.php.net? >> >> Thanks for any insight! >> >> Greetings >> >> Nico >> > > Yeah, something is definitely wrong: > http://gcov.php.net/PHP_5_4/lcov_html/ > vs > http://gcov.php.net/PHP_5_5/lcov_html/ > > and it we dates are correct, the last gcov build for 5.6 was more than a > week ago: > http://gcov.php.net/ > http://gcov.php.net/PHP_5_6/lcov_html/ > > ps: I've cc'ed Nuno as he is the man who knows our gcov setup. > I will ask by the way. Aren't any parts duplicate of what we've got with travis/QA reports now? I mean statistics about passed/failed tests etc. It is probably good to have all such data in one place, but not when tools are not working properly. It also means two systems to maintain and in my opinion leads to confusion as the results are not equal. Regards, Maciej.