Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74700
Return-Path: <php@golemon.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 16781 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2014 15:33:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2014 15:33:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.220.43 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.43 mail-pa0-f43.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.43] ([209.85.220.43:56137] helo=mail-pa0-f43.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2A/00-16437-6499C835 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:33:27 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id kp14so2063148pab.16
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=CCbM+fzuToJ0d/gB9pcYiFrMaTUx0HJAnOt4gGkeftM=;
        b=IGtlZCzYI3/PlfnVzDM7BpeDEBs1lPeBjXNjb0jDBSxNLJLAgpK17JAQxAsclblrbQ
         GdftUfPvwPeuX8dvsHXNZMGcjjsq09/4JcBCklUlV8FYAQx5OqB+8yEBYxCQ9XUDkAnr
         b8pE3PaCmKbDA8uO3gQQNUgZlFRwi7j+KtyXShKIjdAQZp7Cf1CqRaX66xEr1nAWlrq/
         ssKlAVLzGH9ohAPvJT3ndN5nBjuIb7qpXS1gqPb/5aol9946gAsVHX5QYxOjMdnJmobO
         YEvW3AB7Tq0Fs2DXmfAjmVufwWvDNmU2BZIEofbfCzhO4DK2xdala/E0U7NqsFe4RpiI
         RgWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnI8vCmGQ7lMCZsgnpv8n5hsFqfzqUQvxsB4RdIhcprXNqlePDD1CENzAYufMs2RYHhByZ5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.138.227 with SMTP id qt3mr41699321pbb.6.1401722808457;
 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 08:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: php@golemon.com
Received: by 10.70.100.67 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.198.113.183]
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NoRbJRwbQrumK0C5eg-8mdUxcZmgJL6OvBcwpsxdymx6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESVnVpJGOSH=o4tu4YE7EfseSN2oGyHczovDg44fqto1D-nyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4NoRbJRwbQrumK0C5eg-8mdUxcZmgJL6OvBcwpsxdymx6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:26:48 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: AJPl2x-zdjlzbajyKJ_tAZXmvK4
Message-ID: <CAESVnVpkAJoo8VtOxeL10yXjOs==4P=j=9RcdTQ+KgXXHr9esw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] ReflectionParameter::hasTypehint() / getTypehintText()
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)

On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
> We might want to rename `ReflectionTypeAnnotation::isNullable` to
> `ReflectionTypeAnnotation::allowsNull`. I think it is a bit more
> understandable; it also is used by `ReflectionParmeter` so it would be
> a bit more consistent. What do you think?
>
Absent pre-existing uses, I like following the is*() pattern of
isArray/isCallable for consistency.  But good catch, it's probably
best to avoid inconsistency with the parent class.

-Sara