Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74695
Return-Path: <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95351 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2014 09:13:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2014 09:13:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.53 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.53 mail-qg0-f53.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.192.53] ([209.85.192.53:59763] helo=mail-qg0-f53.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 65/CC-15017-E404C835 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:13:51 -0400
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f51so10098878qge.40
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=BdhK+3LomM7MG6uplyiRzRuUUtZbqZzDiB04gWOGtkY=;
        b=B8eWfJharw9n/KYSiuQz/bzbOtCTw3zX2XBCn6jG9pPdsDZv1brXqP40IL76cv149M
         OfIKq4fnUheLv1qObbzyogHc9meGLpY2PPZh8lCjkMtu8ZYTwQuXDkwYjiNJzTDGSMdp
         /vsfnLJd8uN1vWeUsvw7UPhvJoyWtkbFtOktvehJlMR8QgJ9YaakdY1AXEyQ0j8fxxrA
         +x7x/GmjkR7ZW+WrqJRn1fJOiVJoXEmlXavAnKxnJAfK/RIFhNFTvFKoyQT9yxHwNQKf
         CuIHKqt7a9Zseoha1nog2ogVRJq30T6xenERPnU4nRz9lYLs5O7valZi4miTlpZ8rP/E
         erLw==
X-Received: by 10.140.84.168 with SMTP id l37mr44463526qgd.104.1401700428108;
 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.97.246 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1401699341.2282.13.camel@guybrush>
References: <6E3D6B3F-1BD6-42A2-B59C-12B9D6D597ED@ajf.me> <1401699341.2282.13.camel@guybrush>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:13:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAL0xaBH3uLttCJ9AVWGF827COoK_Lm0hM62XmUL7aevOZEC6PA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c117081974f604fad6d00e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Bare Name Array
From: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com (Arvids Godjuks)

--001a11c117081974f604fad6d00e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm personally against it adding :>
It's just pointles and kind'a looks like an object access.
Not to mention that one time access that deep is normal. but if you are
looping through a lot of data - it's quite an overhead and encoruaging
users to do it that way is just plain wrong to me.

As to the 'stringKey' : 3 - don't realy have anything against it, just the
readability is not that great when you put it in on larger array
definitions. => is very clear about what you are looking at and what it
does and is very visible. So, personaly I would prefer to have just one way
of defining key => value in PHP code.

--001a11c117081974f604fad6d00e--