Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74689 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62280 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2014 22:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2014 22:19:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:33673] helo=imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 98/F8-15017-607AB835 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:19:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.200] (unknown [90.203.28.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4D735A00AC; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:19:46 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:19:43 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <6E3D6B3F-1BD6-42A2-B59C-12B9D6D597ED@ajf.me> To: Levi Morrison X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Bare Name Array From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 1 Jun 2014, at 22:15, Levi Morrison wrote: > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> Good evening, >>=20 >> I have created an RFC containing two proposals. >=20 > This should be two RFCs then. Two proposals should be two RFCs. After thinking about it, I=92ve split it into two RFCs: * https://wiki.php.net/rfc/bare_name_array_literal * https://wiki.php.net/rfc/bare_name_array_dereference However, for the sake of avoiding fragmentation, I think it would be = best not to make two new mailing list threads. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/