Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74618 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33461 invoked from network); 29 May 2014 08:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2014 08:28:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:42474] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 88/73-07154-4BFE6835 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 04:28:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47E310C2B9; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:28:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 09:28:33 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= cc: Jakub Zelenka , Julien Pauli , Pierre Joye , John Bafford , Rasmus Lerdorf , PHP internals , Ferenc Kovacs In-Reply-To: <1401304428.2998.118.camel@guybrush> Message-ID: References: <2DC459EE-AE98-4CAE-977A-6FB918FDEF54@bafford.com> <537EA42B.4000000@lerdorf.com> <1401282869.2998.84.camel@guybrush> <1401304428.2998.118.camel@guybrush> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1584458248-1401352113=:5108" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bison 3 support for PHP 5.5 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-1584458248-1401352113=:5108 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 28 May 2014, Johannes Schl=C3=BCter wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:39 +0100, Jakub Zelenka wrote: >=20 > > That would make sense if we didn't have re2c generated files in the rep= o > > already. Anyway I see your point. Bison version varies across the syste= ms > > more than re2c so the diffs in files would be more often which is not a > > good idea... >=20 > The main reason is that re2c is extremely uncommon whereas flex&bison > are common tools for developer meta packages from distributions. Also > historically re2c had only been used for unserialisation which is way > less touched than other scanners and parsers. Maybe when switching from > flex to re2c for ini and source scanners this decision might have been > revised (and I think there actually was a debate) I find the generated files in GIT annoying. Almost every single time I compile I now have to changed files that GIT bitches about. I would be=20 all for removing generated files from the repository. cheers, Derick --8323329-1584458248-1401352113=:5108--