Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74617 php.webmaster:19056 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31847 invoked from network); 29 May 2014 08:25:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2014 08:25:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:42439] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5A/13-07154-31FE6835 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 04:25:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10C510C2B9; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:25:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 09:25:52 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Levi Morrison cc: Kris Craig , Zeev Suraski , Ferenc Kovacs , =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= , Michael Wallner , Andi Gutmans , PHP Internals , php-webmaster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5777562771914574713@unknownmsgid> <1401303702.2998.111.camel@guybrush> <4f7609c82c063f3bb73aed990a7debf7@mail.gmail.com> <452088db796932d97cc99159ca520bc0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP-DEV] about the latest frontpage entry From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 29 May 2014, Levi Morrison wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Kris Craig wrote: > > > Thank you for removing it from the front page, Zeev. It needed to > > be done. > > > > Based on the discussion here, I've compiled an informal count of who > > advocates which action: > > > > Remove the post: 13 (81.25%) > > > > ....and don't replace it: 1 (6.25%; 7.69%) > > > > ....and replace (or modify) it: 10 (62.5%; 76.92%) > > > > ....and ???: 2 (12.5%; 15.38%) > > > > Keep the post: 3 (18.75%) > > > > > > It looks like there's a pretty clear consensus that the post should > > be removed (which it was). There's also a clear consensus that it > > should be replaced with something since it's already been widely > > disseminated. > > For completeness sake, there were people who weighed in on the issue > in IRC but not here. What happens on IRC is important and good for quick reply discussions, but if it's not on the mailinglist, it "does not count". The internals community discusses only officially on this mailinglist only. cheers, Derick