Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74597 php.webmaster:19031
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 57959 invoked from network); 28 May 2014 17:01:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2014 17:01:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.53 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.53 mail-qg0-f53.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.192.53] ([209.85.192.53:41002] helo=mail-qg0-f53.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B3/AA-02991-45616835 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:01:10 -0400
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f51so18573699qge.12
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 28 May 2014 10:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=uB7CMT9YmaTK4qipMBas8ypzwT0I+CQ56RmAX5OTmLY=;
        b=dZEOhSbfzto7e0BM64K7RgyqHG8lurVmr0jHhwXOna0S3Y8ewwO0XciM33rxFDd+LI
         +JpeHBEGx1AGYLKmZqLV9ATvyuCiEdEb3D2FGkezE9b46h3RBnbWMiAecOX/ZQ0vOhxq
         G3WVlMMEFNHSGvJP1kkudwFoPXcef0kr3H1rFTccjws5m6sh1PRWzVkhm1NMy4oeCPm8
         LZ0pSu1lSoQKvj/ko5gp0JA0NWRSJ39NY7qvREJM6gszssv63t9eyCnh5rosJWHQbGbd
         w5nrTI3g+GuHTN617FTKnh+tcpeMFexIoftzueZqySXCRWPfTRbH5OoRR2hMkkWkNS6Q
         DUgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.80.138 with SMTP id t10mr1583500qak.0.1401296466112;
 Wed, 28 May 2014 10:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Wed, 28 May 2014 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5f6e6196e0b7cac6017d9b8672df57a2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH-PCH54+qGf7CzY1Q5r28ck5Fkv0vxQ6_Cj4_y1R1mHHezc7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<F34431ED-22F3-4D77-83DF-F33758B9FC1E@zend.com>
	<998f4156545f1b2fe88c0f1e64b94015@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALJZF3gvRBn_7k-L28+NdEUF+Jz1EbzQuF0-AH=RYGaM72zQuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4NoXexoSgQfxzR4TsPQuB7YNDXqOfP5Yh7Nr7a9eP05ZFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4Nq6QnZGR6dQcgCd0LHkb49T1GMYhENs-g-=VEvr02a2Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5777562771914574713@unknownmsgid>
	<CAFMT4NoUS56VT256AjvmUD26fMeALo0XdX5OqZoZU5eVUJS9ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH4m61vwqYx31YraLuOdmTS1p09EFjbpo3YTcU1EFSq6kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<ec02e1dffec958d5cd7759bfeacbb03d@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH6u_yPLakRTW+1mbBqhHvyrie9TCfk0m713g9uyB+oRdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5f6e6196e0b7cac6017d9b8672df57a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:01:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4Np+=sE1PHihqiuzCNqTNstmShEGpjRg21uiOE=NPcfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>, 
	Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	php-webmaster <php-webmaster@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP-DEV] about the latest frontpage entry
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
> I agree that this doesn't belong to the frontpage, nor do we did ever hav=
e
> stuff like this there.
>
> But I also think that removing it would do more harm than good at this
> point.
>
>
>
> Why?  What=E2=80=99s bad about properly retracting it and explaining it w=
asn=E2=80=99t
> meant for www.php.net?  I=E2=80=99m not arguing for a 404.
>
>
>
> I also think that having a easier to understand channel and posts like th=
is
> to communicate the roadmap and development of the project would be a nice
> thing to have (as long as we don't try to use the frontpage for that).
>
> Agreed.
>
> So I would suggest checking out the updated version from Levi, and discus=
s
> if it still has any controversial stuff.
>
>
>
> Again I have a hard time accepting it as the very existence of the post o=
n
> the front page is controversial.  I=E2=80=99ll wait until I see the new t=
ext but I
> have a hard time imagining what it would look like that would fit
> www.php.net=E2=80=99s <http://www.php.net's> front page.

I like what was proposed earlier here:

- write a text explaining the issue
- add a note, more objectively, about phpng
- remove from www homepage, such things have nothing to do there.
- keep the URL with the new text

Cheers,
--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org