Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74544 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27144 invoked from network); 28 May 2014 09:31:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2014 09:31:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:48782] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 85/96-15325-5ECA5835 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:31:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 24579 invoked by uid 89); 28 May 2014 09:31:14 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 24572, pid: 24576, t: 0.0709s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 28 May 2014 09:31:14 -0000 Message-ID: <5385ADDF.1070003@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:35:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] about the latest frontpage entry From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 28/05/14 08:56, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > I'm mostly interested on the opinion of the core devs, but others also > welcome to reply. Since it has not even been voted on, and at present only a few people can even test it, it is far too early to be pushing this out at all? It has all the ring off PHP6 which was also announced far too early! It SHOULD be replaced with a message that simply says that it is ONE option that may be used as the basis of PHPNext. I still view this as something that could yet another PHP engine rather than the main PHP path until such time as there is a democratic agreement that it should be adopted? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk