Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74505 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55097 invoked from network); 26 May 2014 21:13:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2014 21:13:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.123 smtp123.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.123] ([108.166.43.123:40514] helo=smtp123.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/00-54814-77EA3835 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 17:13:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C074D1A0232; Mon, 26 May 2014 17:13:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 2F4F01A0209; Mon, 26 May 2014 17:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5383AE6E.7000904@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:13:18 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs , Adam Harvey CC: PHP Internals , Nikita Popov References: <537EF4A4.5070102@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Broken tests From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > We don't allow travis to test the 5.4 branch (not sure why), so I Because we have too many tests failing that need some changes to be fixed, and I don't have time to do all of them. If somebody would volunteer to clean them up I'd be very happy :) > wouldn't be surprised if those failing 5.4 tests are fixed in 5.5 and up > where they are more visible. Yes, that's the case. Many tests (and some code too) were fixed for 5.5, but the changes were not backported. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227