Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74464 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9150 invoked from network); 23 May 2014 17:13:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 May 2014 17:13:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.215.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.10 mail.experimentalworks.net Received: from [217.114.215.10] ([217.114.215.10:59271] helo=mail.experimentalworks.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F0/97-01753-AB18F735 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:13:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.31] (ppp-93-104-19-198.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.19.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: johannes@schlueters.de) by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E444946341; Fri, 23 May 2014 19:14:24 +0200 (CEST) To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Pierre Joye , Andrea Faulds , PHP Internals , Bob Weinand , Stas Malyshev , Zeev Suraski , Xinchen Hui , Andi Gutmans , Nikita Popov In-Reply-To: References: <79B69A20-15AD-4C07-B026-61C2C9DEBBE5@ajf.me> <1400851698.2870.9315.camel@guybrush> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 19:13:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1400865189.2870.9321.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Fast Parameter Parsing API From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 19:58 +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > This patch is connected with Zend only in a way, that I worked on it during > last days (it's even not my idea). > but once I saw the idea I saw how it may be useful. I really don't > understand you attitude to us. > We are working hard to make a real big step forward... Thank you for working on it! > 2.5% speedup on real-life is not a good gain? where do you live? :) Yes I agree, 2.5% in real life is quite good. "Nice" obviously is subjective thing and I agree that our role is to do heavy lifting for our users. But what I'd wish is to try to reiterate a round if we can find a "nicer" API. (I'll experiment, too, not sure I'll have a "good" proposal) johannes