Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74410 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88853 invoked from network); 21 May 2014 13:29:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 May 2014 13:29:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:42777] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5D/C8-24198-22AAC735 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:29:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF0F200083; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:29:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.registrar-servers.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qhT2Ac4f3WGp; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.200] (unknown [90.203.28.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 721A320006B; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:28:54 +0100 Cc: PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <6048BA05-CC13-46DD-8439-9CB4EE29078B@ajf.me> References: To: Nicolai Scheer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] encode php scripts with opcache compatibility From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 21 May 2014, at 11:20, Nicolai Scheer = wrote: > I'm currently facing the situation, that I need to protect my php = sources > and retain opcache compatibility. =93Protect=94? Why? Are you trying to ship a product to customers which = will be run by them, and not have them view the source? In which case, what=92s wrong with obfuscation? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/