Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74382 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99904 invoked from network); 20 May 2014 18:18:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 May 2014 18:18:42 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.11 experimentalworks.net Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:18:41 -0400 Received: from [217.114.215.11] ([217.114.215.11:10041] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3B/10-31952-F7C9B735 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 14:18:41 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <53788337.9090006@lerdorf.com> <53789AD9.40109@lerdorf.com> User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) Message-ID: X-Posted-By: 217.114.215.11 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Rethinking 64bit sizes and PHP-NG From: dsp@php.net (David Soria Parra) Derick Rethans schrieb: > On Mon, 19 May 2014, Anatol Belski wrote: > >> Confused about what is happening. I thought we reached the agreement >> based on what Nikita has suggested, which is pretty simple. > > I'm confused too, mostly because with the ML problems, I missed a lot of > the discussion. I think it would be best to close the current RFC and > voting, make sure there is a new "correct" RFC and restart the vote. If > all the concerns that are raised by various people have been included, > then, I think that's a much clearer way to figure out what we'd be > voting for. I agree. It is rather confusing and I have a hard time keeping up with what the current agreement is. Can we please stop the votes on the current RFC work on it and vote again. I might want to remind people that it is a Request for Comments. Comments we got and now it's time to integrate them before rushing into a vote, which is why I haven't voted neither yes or no so far. However I cannot vote "yes" on the current state of the RFC.