Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74366 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90208 invoked from network); 19 May 2014 16:52:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 May 2014 16:52:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.48 mail-qg0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.48] ([209.85.192.48:38713] helo=mail-qg0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B4/01-15420-8E63A735 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 12:52:56 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so9104486qgf.7 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JVezClgfR4xOmzuhUmXVZNfaX9M8NtwImc7A3dYc5YI=; b=kNYjnMtibfJB8HJdhenSuLMAcCMyl5p/x9UHFzuDs34MQrtsfE7DxubQa9c2HIdQwY aEzBzb6EG9vFxQNJpOLswtRmOlnXSmqh485ns0lpVkvisa7s4O7keXUhmApkopQrc4B5 eMY+74laJp7jKBqlG1YxZ5dboSBp+i1mMXh+kFwta+CEo7RZ/L6AWhOkSdLrUgeJ169A WpoxzWXc/iy23HvRH2JvIfScGdoM0M9b2nMgyvDVLKkzN/RHNYbmIbbP0D/Knm0Px8Ch R+nbzMJKKnOxeUsvRR55t9Y8TVFrChdudTHvIE+GZqmyZx95Qyw2egxDpOnFcxdkq2GZ zp8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.91.5 with SMTP id y5mr49273591qgd.12.1400518373096; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <537A35D9.50807@lerdorf.com> References: <53788337.9090006@lerdorf.com> <53789AD9.40109@lerdorf.com> <537A35D9.50807@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:52:52 +0200 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: Nikita Popov , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Rethinking 64bit sizes and PHP-NG From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > But that is for minor tweaks and optimizations. In this case the way to > optimize the patch is to undo the 64-bitness in a number of places where > it doesn't make sense. Putting in a software-imposed limit on class size > names while still keeping it a 64-bit value in the struct makes no > sense, for example. Same goes for lineno, line_start, line_end, num_args > and a couple more that Nikita pointed out. That's not what we discussed. > And as far as I am concerned this has nothing to do with phpng. I'd > still be voting no on it as a 4% memory increase, which, by the way, you > don't even mention in the impacts section, is still too high for me when > I know parts of the 4% are completely unnecessary. We answer that already, be from Nikita, Dmitry or I. And yes, we agree on these points already. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org