Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74333
Return-Path: <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 42373 invoked from network); 18 May 2014 09:06:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 May 2014 09:06:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.172 mail-qc0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.172] ([209.85.216.172:55420] helo=mail-qc0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id BE/44-12623-92878735 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 18 May 2014 05:06:50 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6so7003370qcy.17
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 18 May 2014 02:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=zm5ao7m9zOhTQgNdrgnxFbsdRbUfjVOhkAKvGwJioFA=;
        b=0iIXC2MUCWlPUHy6GwQujJPunw9zs7exGOSz6NO9NGpfFGWSHJLzNk6VC3ea2pHo7i
         RSRPrird2g0p5LU6wAk4ftuRdjTRlUdFe4Ltk1OJpWQM62qmfhE1S3Da+uzCU8gX6Y2v
         mInp/tSwf5D6PoulzQi+WSzd4YdioYe6uRm9yIlz8lLr/uzrA52t9XnLeCJFC/VI/UGs
         rcKQbs4EdfTAE/tuv9j4O+O8bbreCR10nbLNzDLr97YOA+5kVAyBNKCLdtc+nBUF07Fc
         qQkWJomV4k3GzpCnjuDddONjX/HZMD9O8bPhHkGLl6HEmEk9G93d2c7m2txdnLSjXEbw
         64HQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.90.84 with SMTP id w78mr38486983qgd.52.1400404007343;
 Sun, 18 May 2014 02:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.17.77 with HTTP; Sun, 18 May 2014 02:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73XtiO5Sz7TdYOZS1CoJm787Tsw_rXwbD_fr0ZZYscNs=aA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A3E9D7E0-5C10-48AD-B141-F3D72B74A235@ajf.me>
	<CAKOpQSxunKrFs3vO28fNs93KdWfhoG3V88kVmwt8vBus0Gw1vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73XtiO5Sz7TdYOZS1CoJm787Tsw_rXwbD_fr0ZZYscNs=aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 11:06:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH6P9CBEyzT3DoPPsn673cNgoPO6t4frvQfTF-59wmRvpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
Cc: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c117a8665c2a04f9a8f792
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001a11c117a8665c2a04f9a8f792
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:02 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:

> My vote is for 66%+1 on engine and/or language changes and 50%+1 on side
> changes.
> If I want to suggest a Jsonable interface which purely affects a subset o=
f
> functions and nothing else, I don't think 66% is needed for change to go
> in.
>
> My 2=C2=A2,
>
>
this is what I would consider reasonable too, with the extension than any
removal of existing (and documented) functionallity should also require 2/3
of the votes.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--001a11c117a8665c2a04f9a8f792--