Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74322 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7154 invoked from network); 17 May 2014 23:53:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2014 23:53:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kris.craig@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kris.craig@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.169 mail-qc0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.169] ([209.85.216.169:48789] helo=mail-qc0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D9/32-28415-076F7735 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 19:53:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e16so6843277qcx.0 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=55bpEwMSDR+bMLjPDZV0SHSknVdckJ/LFqp45G7L/Mw=; b=sYgHpiT8POOKd5MhPYvTf4AaMV9oiimpR/Zihm4nk88L1OK5y25EqMgidmzvRycndF YEsV/FxzHKnkA91geIbs7ehZidQHpJn8C/AyxmbQs0KCFjWz9QletpH6Yhcb29yYI3Wp RiATcQC/6gRQQYV+kT34YHeBsA6xoiK2A1MWiTX329MMMSTQ/LPyctkDNjVYFNZRc6s3 MZWfJHo+MMaiF9fzuH4g3oBNylf9x42kvwF8ioCYoAO1LUoHZxe6ydjyz+hG1OlEg8cq ULLTQSOeYDOtKDC3lR64n2hWzIPMGgZS78KgmgKC9s4ntcR/uJZdzyCNu+CT5YHqn4af Js1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.109.201 with SMTP id l67mr35903117qgf.72.1400370798515; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.88.164 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140517133037.GA6153@analysisandsolutions.com> References: <20140517133037.GA6153@analysisandsolutions.com> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 16:53:18 -0700 Message-ID: To: Daniel Convissor Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , Zeev Suraski , Nikita Popov , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a3740ffdc6f04f9a13be5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 2/3 vote needed (was: 64 bit platform improvements...) From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig) --001a113a3740ffdc6f04f9a13be5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Convissor < danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote: > Folks: > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:12:18AM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > I think it still mandates a 66%+1 vote. > > Agreed. This is a major change. > > Sincerely, > > --Dan > > -- > T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y > data intensive web and database programming > http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I agree that it should have been, but under the current language of the voting RFC, it can also be reasonably interpreted to call for a simple majority. The RFC author chose to go with simple majority and left it there. Trying to change the requirement mid-vote would be far more troubling, in my view. Instead, we should discuss clarifying that language in the voting RFC so that the interpretation is not so subjective in the future. --Kris --001a113a3740ffdc6f04f9a13be5--