Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74316 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95606 invoked from network); 17 May 2014 21:58:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2014 21:58:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.91 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.91 smtp91.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.91] ([108.166.43.91:44201] helo=smtp91.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 71/20-28415-56BD7735 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 17:57:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D7B2F140CE3; Sat, 17 May 2014 17:57:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp4.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 5EBE4140B49; Sat, 17 May 2014 17:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5377DB60.7050601@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:57:52 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anatol Belski , Dmitry Stogov CC: Lester Caine , PHP internals References: <4ED7146272E04A47B986ED49E771E347BBDA6AAA06@Ikarus.ameusgmbh.intern> <537333BF.7070106@lsces.co.uk> <5373C674.9030402@lsces.co.uk> <9fb17c9f5735c8323ff4940b452e2631.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> In-Reply-To: <9fb17c9f5735c8323ff4940b452e2631.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > That's pretty sad guys. Applause for playing me for a fool (well, probably > not only me). On the other hand, I'd be honored to be as stupid as that > old farts from ANSI who wrote the specs. I'm not sure how anything I said or did constitutes "playing you for a fool". I still think it is a good thing to do - except for the part that I voiced my objections to (and others did as well), and if we resolve this objection, I certainly not hope the patch dies off, quite the contrary. In fact, my mail makes even more sense now that we know that evolutionary branch I've talked about without knowing if it will happen - is actually happening in phpng. I'd certainly be happy to have the changes brought into that branch - but we need to solve that memory issue. I hope we can do it and find common ground - i.e. what Nikita just recently proposed looks like a good way to go. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227