Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74315 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92894 invoked from network); 17 May 2014 21:33:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2014 21:33:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:53471] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/68-53190-885D7735 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 17:32:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE0010C016; Sat, 17 May 2014 22:32:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 22:32:53 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Andrea Faulds cc: Zeev Suraski , Levi Morrison , internals In-Reply-To: <57E53747-4985-4273-9911-D09B4616A104@ajf.me> Message-ID: References: <46e6ebb1de57c25be1bb5eb3bdfab1b5@mail.gmail.com> <57E53747-4985-4273-9911-D09B4616A104@ajf.me> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Building a better PHP together. From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 17 May 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > On 17 May 2014, at 21:11, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > >> Here are some behaviors that are inappropriate: > >> - Asking members of the list to vote in a particular way > > > > There's actually nothing wrong with that. I absolutely don't think > > this should become a rule or a guideline. > > I disagree. We should not have rallying cries on the list asking > people with no connection or opinion on something to vote a certain > way. That is unacceptable behaviour. It's a lot better to rally for your cause out in the open than in private discussions in the back of IRC. It's a lot more transparent, at least to see where people stand. cheers, Derick