Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74309
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9eiLvAZHZQ0yDHHyFVc=jN6DLer5nX5Q014_fomDNGJYAujQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A3E9D7E0-5C10-48AD-B141-F3D72B74A235@ajf.me>
	<4818449979808f1f4d0fcdc1409d9e04@mail.gmail.com>
	<A5BF8ADD-121B-487B-8FA3-DCAAA254362E@ajf.me>
	<CA+9eiLvAZHZQ0yDHHyFVc=jN6DLer5nX5Q014_fomDNGJYAujQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 22:42:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4vTgz+pEbv_k_7w5evbFa43-xYxD9rrC553+kyjNemnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> I think that the serious core changes require technical expertise before
> voting (like Nikita made).
> And the results of such expertise should be published in additional to RFC
> on the same page.

So basically, based on what you say, many if not all new features in
5.4 or 5.5 would have been rejected per se because they were done by
new developers.

Sorry, I rather prefer to keep things like they are and improve/solve
confusing wording instead of going back to the benevolent dictators
time.


-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org