Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74305 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77266 invoked from network); 17 May 2014 20:36:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2014 20:36:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.220.182 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.182 mail-vc0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.182] ([209.85.220.182:58209] helo=mail-vc0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6B/05-53190-948C7735 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 16:36:25 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id la4so7832636vcb.41 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/NePoFuxPcDWOO/J7NNVDqJb7w9tkVw45Zd6ZIkUfvU=; b=i4sRUr6E4nO+/1rznA7sDrWNHKjqi87xF30xjZCHwQdBQ+0t/z+IpROv3m+xIj8u1D q/rt+pKtvICV0cQodfhpsE0vpYq1GkGAgrmE4m3YRbv90P1CJYtfFuL84rP1mY307bYj +NjQmzDOktpj+jzHfJWQUIsklN79j7RfzkXEWj7GpnrDJKt5fXhRBtp5Fl5zzL3kvlDm KOxcW+Gf6RpzF3SDsssSgbpKcobuNHwNLGPeX2ekYr/3s7mhYkUdMzRxFAjN51SqkZOO DCYIgLELCYcNrKBd1RqbD0K5XNsGbf5ozoqrl/+cSv2G5hw7VI6NZL5Jyqn7z92HlBSl b6nA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJs3dqNGnSvflb8KnL8HOD7jfubBvyW5kDp93vOwtyKcBFpXjkFENwqtf1qYY43zCW2VeKG/vgCS/EcamW7i4EI/ReduK4JzkPG+lZWc93PreTiq+jFKNRZf63isxXJOzqLghh MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.62.131 with SMTP id xa3mr4619597vcb.13.1400358983036; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.111.71 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:36:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4818449979808f1f4d0fcdc1409d9e04@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 00:36:22 +0400 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Zeev Suraski , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11362b18be140604f99e7b9f Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov) --001a11362b18be140604f99e7b9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that the serious core changes require technical expertise before voting (like Nikita made). And the results of such expertise should be published in additional to RFC on the same page. Thanks. Dmitry. On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > On 17 May 2014, at 20:46, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > Implementation changes don't fit in this RFC process too well. > > Implementation changes should be dealt with by those who own the > > implementation. > > I don=E2=80=99t and can=E2=80=99t agree with this. Zend changes will ulti= mately affect > everyone. > > It is not just Zend maintainers who=E2=80=99ll be affected by the 64-bit = patch, > for example. Everyone would, as it would increase PHP=E2=80=99s memory us= age. > > Also, I am unconvinced that just because the people who maintain Zend > (say) want something, that they are necessarily right. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --001a11362b18be140604f99e7b9f--