Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74283 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41096 invoked from network); 17 May 2014 17:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2014 17:59:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.169 mail-qc0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.169] ([209.85.216.169:53679] helo=mail-qc0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 44/10-39307-773A7735 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:59:19 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e16so6512673qcx.28 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1FWeIQ+x61/RQuZ6GeWx37eog55ieQoY9589MPo2ov8=; b=hW+WPTchS9WFx+vC8dm2JfNplZtnLJCbSxpmi/P5SjQFfEzMDQ5TJJ0eiAI+AV05nE QfwZlnflhSHnMJWv5Wrhu0XfqGhQ5SNrzpx0/89MM/5yT3+quOvMpOLDXEaeRbhupfz/ fa0rAGVgXlUsxzPio3Rn62Ar3dHmIBrGE5s4/tYZPeWqe6optFSPsZGMsZOhDbMiNNIH vDYJSZrr04qM7csGEjroFOBKqmJxxjn5D2iqHfFnruuISwv44HfMwblEeJcrYmC/h3Eo lRpJM3kzCgLewOb6KBsI0X+yM34l7Gtc546eFAoKjxQLUh665/nvtB9DJFNZMxbu9qbR OTOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.49.67 with SMTP id u3mr33896133qaf.63.1400349556315; Sat, 17 May 2014 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4081130594864738388@unknownmsgid> References: <3939936079205827190@unknownmsgid> <2422EE67-5206-4A27-9175-3C738A9128C9@ajf.me> <4081130594864738388@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 19:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: PHP internals , Andrea Faulds Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ef80ddddfd04f99c49c5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] A call for help (urgent) From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a11c2ef80ddddfd04f99c49c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On May 17, 2014 5:38 PM, "Zeev Suraski" wrote: > > On 17 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2014, at 17:32, Andrea Faulds = wrote: > > > > That has nothing to do with the fact applying this patch is morally wrong= , > and also may or may not be true. > Morally wrong? But doing months of Dev in secret while knowing that we work on the same area is morally awesome? > > Unlike phpng, this is a tactical patch that while changes a lot of code, is > mostly about "dirty work" than research. A hack over a hack remains a hack. With all respects to the authors and what they achieved so far. > Spinning phpng's work as something evil is as ridiculous as it is wrong. Who said that? > Sabotaging it because of it is even worse. Excuse me? > You don't seem to realize what's going on here. It won't delay it, it'll > greatly slow it down, and given phpng is all about performance - it negates This is again wrong. It is not slow but a small memory usage increase. It is even actually faster with the 64bit patch in many cases (based on 5.6+patch, phpng+patch coming as soon as I am done with making it portable)= . > For the current PHP it yields an 8% memory increase. Wrong again. We show 4% increase. --001a11c2ef80ddddfd04f99c49c5--