Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74205 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60324 invoked from network); 14 May 2014 18:24:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2014 18:24:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.67 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.67 smtp67.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.67] ([108.166.43.67:33635] helo=smtp67.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/2F-15285-4C4B3735 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:24:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 405BB149226; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:24:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp1.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 8849E148E48; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:24:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5373B4C0.9010900@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:24:00 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski , Nikita Popov CC: PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > * Add the relevant performance feedback from Dmitry to the RFC, as well as > his concerns as the chief performance guy php.net has > * Provide an option for people to vote 'yes' for the IS_LONG size part only I would gladly vote yes for types renaming too, even though zpp part is a bit worrying, but we may end up rewriting zpp anyway soon (it's long due) so it may not be that much of an issue. 64-bit lengths though are a bit of an issue for me. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227