Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74189
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EEB2F400-786F-4379-A336-DCB26229093B@ajf.me>
References: <e5f19ac0089d24adc695fce93ad9bd9c.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<EEB2F400-786F-4379-A336-DCB26229093B@ajf.me>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:16:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6kiUCsbsYPXxegmXGn1FV_mrT2Gi+edYDJfcGHaxg9Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string
 length and integer
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2014, at 21:51, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:
>
>> as announced previously, the vote starts on May 13th and ends on May 20t=
h.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/size_t_and_int64_next#vote
>>
>> The RFC is considered approved with 50%+1 acceptance. Happy voting :)
>
> Actually, I have another question. Maybe I=E2=80=99m missing something, b=
ut anyway, what does the =E2=80=98phpng=E2=80=99 merge strategy on the vote=
 mean?

Despite the blocking attempt happening now, we still think than
cooperation is better than trying to block other people work.

The idea is to merge the 64bit patch in phpng instead of master,
reducing the work for other developers while it will significantly
increase the amount of work for us.


Cheers,
--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org