Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74169
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53732BC8.30707@lsces.co.uk>
References: <e5f19ac0089d24adc695fce93ad9bd9c.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<CA+9eiLuoJM5bwA46M_2YddTXYOhAwhii=9Ref7-NNeuRuBfW5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7zz=npjUhacwSBA6cz+kb9iBmn3fjkvYuAjqtiPQgJhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c9J5mtTzqFxvQHka5w5zVoGOzXNaUeYec62X_LYLOPcxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6L0TCyR+U-eEJnwfYbxfMRibpKB70_Ue5fTOHD4y_VAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<53732673.3080106@lsces.co.uk>
	<CAH-PCH5b3wdu3vERp+LTnoSSs2_cX5wNy6hZc6MK6TPiBZDpRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<53732BC8.30707@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:46:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH6ZpvsoXzMGA51rDghjYxTeKaAMKATFyMgbVnxbc80GBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01536b72fbcba504f9583690
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string
 length and integer
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--089e01536b72fbcba504f9583690
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> On 14/05/14 09:22, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>>     Hopefully there is no plan to backport this to the PHP5 builds?
>>
>> both the phpng and the size_t rfcs are targetting the next major
>> version, none of them are accepted yet, both of those would/will be
>> suitable for 'home users'.
>> buth these are all public information, stated in the RFCs and discussed
>> on internals@ which you seems to be subscribed on based on your replies
>> to the list, so I'm not sure where the confusion comes from.
>>
>
> Since original discussions were being targeted against PHP5 picking out
> where discussions have moved on is not easily obvious. I seem to recall
> this was originally targeted against PHP5?
>
> Have we reached a point where PHP5 has been 'frozen' and so PHPNext is th=
e
> more detailed target today?
>
>
I guess you are referring to the previous rfc of the size_t, which was
targetting 5.6 and failed?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/size_t_and_int64
many of the no voters mentioned that they would support the rfc but not in
a minor version hence the authors accepted and now tried to get in into the
next major, and here we are atm.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--089e01536b72fbcba504f9583690--