Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74166 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 58986 invoked from network); 14 May 2014 08:36:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2014 08:36:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:38487] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D2/83-40033-11B23735 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 04:36:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 22512 invoked by uid 89); 14 May 2014 08:36:30 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 22505, pid: 22509, t: 0.0739s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 14 May 2014 08:36:30 -0000 Message-ID: <53732BC8.30707@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:39:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <53732673.3080106@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 14/05/14 09:22, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > Hopefully there is no plan to backport this to the PHP5 builds? > > both the phpng and the size_t rfcs are targetting the next major > version, none of them are accepted yet, both of those would/will be > suitable for 'home users'. > buth these are all public information, stated in the RFCs and discussed > on internals@ which you seems to be subscribed on based on your replies > to the list, so I'm not sure where the confusion comes from. Since original discussions were being targeted against PHP5 picking out where discussions have moved on is not easily obvious. I seem to recall this was originally targeted against PHP5? Have we reached a point where PHP5 has been 'frozen' and so PHPNext is the more detailed target today? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk