Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74073
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender)
References: <CAFMT4NqysLiRJH5vye2qbbwwPuAce4e+dRXqkVN2UnwzOw=qvA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NqysLiRJH5vye2qbbwwPuAce4e+dRXqkVN2UnwzOw=qvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <11C7CA9B-2E1D-40B7-8AED-5E039DF87B8C@gmail.com>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 06:22:14 +0800
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Anonymous functions inside static methods.
From: tjerk.meesters@gmail.com (Tjerk Meesters)

Hi

> On 9 May, 2014, at 6:02 am, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
>=20
> See this 3v4l (contents at bottom of the message): http://3v4l.org/pHkf7
>=20
> I think Bar::bar() should definitely return 'Bar' (currently returns 'Foo'=
)
> but what about the Bar::Baz() call?
>=20
> Until today I didn't even know you could declare a static anonymous
> function, so I'm not really sure what the expected behavior is.
>=20
> Script contents:
> <?php
>=20
> class Foo {
> static function bar() {
>        $foo =3D static function() {
>            return get_called_class();
>        };

=46rom what I gather, the use of static on closures only limits as to what y=
ou can bind it to, i.e. ->bindTo() will not accept an instance to bind to.

>=20
>        return $foo();
>    }
> static function baz() {
>        $foo =3D function() {
>            return get_called_class();
>        };
>=20
>        return $foo();
>    }
> }
>=20
> class Bar extends Foo {
>=20
> }
>=20
>=20
> assert(Bar::bar() =3D=3D=3D 'Bar');
> assert(Bar::baz() =3D=3D=3D 'Bar');