Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74072
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.46 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 16:02:45 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NqysLiRJH5vye2qbbwwPuAce4e+dRXqkVN2UnwzOw=qvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158ab9613f26004f8eaa4da
Subject: Anonymous functions inside static methods.
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

--089e0158ab9613f26004f8eaa4da
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

See this 3v4l (contents at bottom of the message): http://3v4l.org/pHkf7

I think Bar::bar() should definitely return 'Bar' (currently returns 'Foo')
but what about the Bar::Baz() call?

Until today I didn't even know you could declare a static anonymous
function, so I'm not really sure what the expected behavior is.

Script contents:
<?php

class Foo {
static function bar() {
        $foo = static function() {
            return get_called_class();
        };

        return $foo();
    }
static function baz() {
        $foo = function() {
            return get_called_class();
        };

        return $foo();
    }
}

class Bar extends Foo {

}


assert(Bar::bar() === 'Bar');
assert(Bar::baz() === 'Bar');

--089e0158ab9613f26004f8eaa4da--