Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74069
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1F1617B3-5338-484F-9EC4-B5C78623F364@ajf.me>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6Eh6pXOXyX_pVEm2bcsZtfoLwLND-HeCuk3xMuwpc4xQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLvHLWuA81s-oQY4Q7qydFRgskYDUOL6tSctyoe5Aw1z4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VtgtCBb9miiOUAOZVNGfEt5+BkBLsTO57Aiuvk6JFGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLtojqZZ-5SQSvitNkwL=Knp7NxwKSth3dHYNsFZDcAeRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VrgxCBGbNTpzQTK_TWf4VB4840dBmzraJc8YgORR7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5369CED9.5010001@php.net>
	<4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid>
	<p1ckm9piqkj12566f4bkctuius58680mgq@4ax.com>
	<1F1617B3-5338-484F-9EC4-B5C78623F364@ajf.me>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 23:20:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEp07h_kmh5nDhd=AkEanrW9sgt9OC8C5Yw6Eoc8o0k0n5UeSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01294d0cd325ca04f8ea0dda
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: martin.keckeis1@gmail.com (Martin Keckeis)

--089e01294d0cd325ca04f8ea0dda
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 07.05.2014 15:18 schrieb "Andrea Faulds" <ajf@ajf.me>:
>
>
> On 7 May 2014, at 14:13, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>
> > Zeev Suraski in php.internals (Wed, 7 May 2014 09:36:14 +0300):
> >> Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would
> >> need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD).
> >> Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and
> >> while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly
> >> brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be
> >> relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner).
> >
> > Is Fastcgi capable of supporting 2 versions of PHP? I still need PHP 5.=
3
> > for Drupal6, but Drupal7, Wordpress, Modx and the like profit from PHP
> > 5.5. If there was a way to run both versions as Fastcgi, I would happil=
y
> > go along with you. But  I haven't found out how to do that, so one of
> > the two still is mod_php.
>
>
> Correct me if I=E2=80=99m wrong, but don=E2=80=99t you simply need to hav=
e two PHP
versions installed (5.3 FastCGI and 5.5 FastCGI) and then reference the
appropriate ones in your server configuration files? The hard bit would be
the dual installation (you=E2=80=99d probably need to build from source), b=
ut
having the web server handle both should be trivial.
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>

Yep its easy with vhosts :-)
The only problem is when you need the "php" global command for both
versions...

--089e01294d0cd325ca04f8ea0dda--