Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74054 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75656 invoked from network); 8 May 2014 12:46:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2014 12:46:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.128.172 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.172 mail-ve0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.172] ([209.85.128.172:60707] helo=mail-ve0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/10-08138-39C7B635 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 08:46:11 -0400 Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id oz11so3181618veb.3 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 05:46:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wko/s/sjex8NWfChlcW2GKibbzdTMNFzMdMuwuYuNsg=; b=AKzTgN7LegzbM/Dl+y/QIYlsRmKFWb05VFSroGcBStQAciHloKZbg6P5gK6HAoP4iH N3vsy08PyU7Fyf20/jT5fSkfqiPLZPf0x6xs4aShtQSG8lCOGDGj/gdBj7lZQYdweqH7 9fmSrBYdJVDcFAudZ863s4NQ5+10LAsQt2tBi+90SoaTNLBCLyvbZjZcixAjVOW1QV2+ fd6ym2VZiwLkkc/Ze7sqH9w8Kh+uqdKMYIJoo+yvyIJXLUq8mnSlFOMW18TqV6rGASYK pSW+KxvSf0BEW9XYwJZVn9+nXxWK8UtejatWnzATVls1U+6+Mb3gjktVWrxYarRMDIRy GDrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmm0VlFnOvNMRmpIRlgIfRM3pKTrh+92oXlOrx6Ww4AQCaq/IBrSO1+VkccPQqSZBFblakfXPOL/sePChJprPfgWDEg9m1Llliv3YndvGQCxJsN9SFZ5ZcNnVKJ2bVRntYjrTza X-Received: by 10.58.169.97 with SMTP id ad1mr423772vec.45.1399553168648; Thu, 08 May 2014 05:46:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <5369CED9.5010001@php.net> <4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid> <578A5A21-A820-42AD-A218-FB8049F63B82@zend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <578A5A21-A820-42AD-A218-FB8049F63B82@zend.com> Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:46:06 +0300 Message-ID: <4023102707179619765@unknownmsgid> To: Andi Gutmans Cc: Sebastian Bergmann , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b677d3677750504f8e2ddff Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) --047d7b677d3677750504f8e2ddff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2014, at 04:50, Andi Gutmans = wrote: On May 6, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: On 7 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2014, at 09:13, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Playing devil's advocate: does anyone really need SAPIs other than FastCGI, CLI, and embed? And if so: do we care enough to burden ourselves with their maintenance? I think you just called me "the devil" ;) Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD). Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner). I'd support it. For what it=E2=80=99s worth I don=E2=80=99t think we should stop supporting= mod_php at this point in time. I think there are still plenty of situations where this is the easier, simpler route to go and quite robust. Such as? FastCGI (or fpm) is just as robust, it's a lot more scalable and has mostly just advantages. The main thing mod_php has going for it is history. There are no real technological advances and the rise of PHP on nginx can attest to that. Zeev --047d7b677d3677750504f8e2ddff--