Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74047
Return-Path: <andi@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 37688 invoked from network); 8 May 2014 01:56:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2014 01:56:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.192.180 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.180 mail-pd0-f180.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.192.180] ([209.85.192.180:45619] helo=mail-pd0-f180.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 41/11-31332-464EA635 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 May 2014 21:56:53 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y10so1788000pdj.25
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 May 2014 18:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
         :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
         :to;
        bh=p2WbZxQHMQ4JAgv8JxItN1/cUNIkWZqNP+jV/Nhg8HE=;
        b=g9e2wo+hI9SbP0Me/yAgc3swSyYhLR8f8FLSNOMSPHL1X4QJdANYKEXHJU0AkJpSE1
         dz8y43PdkS4w7t+qeBNk26xTv1HQyzrhEet9n3/biGTQA/BwRP/pYe6aqKfqR0r3BPwV
         oj5C4fs8HM/mOkauAaPIKprHXX8739yBf3o6Oayy5+UHpK4hYjTH69QMSn/YlCAitJfU
         P+VeM6iMEXgf+aSmPGfHP2rKHppua862QQr0NTFEB8bzbz0GvNo8WuXMlZbyFETAb95B
         sMvRGANCXPE8FmJJTNpr0ayq8Q77toKaxNkRCR4B6t8PD+H6P5ll/BMrLqX/4pmmumok
         Cx4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwbKqsxd2PEb1/exQp/EOrL+E/bTwndxkrF28Grz/OL+9cpAqWMIRx5JRfQSnp0fDr4nOA/vnHxMnEwI6tXLJTAiu7643Y4gw5nBF3iib08Fn0sZ4U0LeeItD/eGWt3JqiWacz
X-Received: by 10.66.252.135 with SMTP id zs7mr1433774pac.13.1399514208755;
        Wed, 07 May 2014 18:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-130-225-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.225.174])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id au16sm120854498pac.27.2014.05.07.18.56.46
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 07 May 2014 18:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
In-Reply-To: <536A8E5C.4020606@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 18:56:45 -0700
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>,
 Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>,
 Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>,
 Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>,
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <A3DB8C6D-7B58-4567-BEA2-55A87971812E@zend.com>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEZPtU6Eh6pXOXyX_pVEm2bcsZtfoLwLND-HeCuk3xMuwpc4xQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+9eiLvHLWuA81s-oQY4Q7qydFRgskYDUOL6tSctyoe5Aw1z4w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEZPtU6VtgtCBb9miiOUAOZVNGfEt5+BkBLsTO57Aiuvk6JFGg@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+9eiLtojqZZ-5SQSvitNkwL=Knp7NxwKSth3dHYNsFZDcAeRA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEZPtU6VrgxCBGbNTpzQTK_TWf4VB4840dBmzraJc8YgORR7Dw@mail.gmail.com>	<5369CED9.5010001@php.net>	<4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid>	<CAH-PCH6fszP0M9oFVs1vhBfHrUB5Su+EpxQ1-Z4e-RsODw32Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9eiLuo37FWy-oAL+KO4_tqS04U=8fVe1eNfDxVJZ8cBP-_jA@mail.gmail.com> <536A8E5C.4020606@sugarcrm.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)

On May 7, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> =
wrote:

> Hi!
>=20
>> I recently converted apache2handler to support phpng and it's =
appeared
>> significantly slower than FastCGI and FPM.
>=20
> Do we know why? I would assume since FastCGI has additional data hop
> (between webserver and the actual PHP binary) Apache one would be =
faster
> but looks like it's not so. It'd be interesting to know why.

I think in some cases the benchmarks I=92ve seen are not =
apples-to-apples. I would also like to see this on true apples to =
apples. [assuming no static files are served].

By the way, at some point there was one reason for FastCGI to be faster =
- php-cgi was non-PIC while mod_php.so was PIC. But I believe on Linux =
you can have shared libraries that are non-PIC. [PIC meaning position =
independent code].

Andi