Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74046
Return-Path: <andi@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 36208 invoked from network); 8 May 2014 01:50:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2014 01:50:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.220.51 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.51 mail-pa0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.51] ([209.85.220.51:62185] helo=mail-pa0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 0C/B0-31332-003EA635 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 May 2014 21:50:56 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id kq14so1945858pab.24
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 May 2014 18:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
         :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
         :to;
        bh=vpntRztJDcuOx/kp2ktEL5YYFG6p2fkvDo3kN0Xu910=;
        b=HoG7CvS7QxFzok9h9gv2TxVK2rLtzhZpcl3lgsOPmfZ6dmVEU+lR12p/uZ8o/eQW42
         UihiOXiHp2jzJKHfXypphg/AmkxDyIxIgrzsKWdt69K1NJnhz2yTSiqLBsujRM/s18wB
         HdXEQbyingwBP0u61r4Y1wZDTyrXs3o+33OUBxWKO7laB7iB9kTHCVyMZvJIp/2wncJ6
         kGBU0MS8v59WkbfxvnJiFgxEap6gGPP9PeenCjclZ9RaY4eD8E+OT18yGb2rsjorO1dS
         mR5N4jWkb+1eKZ3GsgWnMbHrvb9dLj+QI5lBznkwMPmdb6gmfUSKEJbm7kRBBK36MHF9
         QXsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvJnfYUjxEeHKbpAyAU4nUaBekFlmtI7nN0LWXRYk8+As+SPUbGg1JVeb09cTLzhWzq4YT7bYUoidfqW7oOFEkNGlfhzKleoz2ifkJxeeiT9JxWdUuiRmtgADtzKZKxdNILCau
X-Received: by 10.66.120.201 with SMTP id le9mr1493696pab.98.1399513853427;
        Wed, 07 May 2014 18:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-130-225-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.225.174])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm121363891pat.36.2014.05.07.18.50.51
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 07 May 2014 18:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
In-Reply-To: <4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 18:50:50 -0700
Cc: Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>,
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <578A5A21-A820-42AD-A218-FB8049F63B82@zend.com>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6Eh6pXOXyX_pVEm2bcsZtfoLwLND-HeCuk3xMuwpc4xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9eiLvHLWuA81s-oQY4Q7qydFRgskYDUOL6tSctyoe5Aw1z4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6VtgtCBb9miiOUAOZVNGfEt5+BkBLsTO57Aiuvk6JFGg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9eiLtojqZZ-5SQSvitNkwL=Knp7NxwKSth3dHYNsFZDcAeRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6VrgxCBGbNTpzQTK_TWf4VB4840dBmzraJc8YgORR7Dw@mail.gmail.com> <5369CED9.5010001@php.net> <4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)

On May 6, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

>> On 7 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2014, at 09:13, Sebastian Bergmann =
<sebastian@php.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>> Playing devil's advocate: does anyone really need SAPIs other than
>> FastCGI, CLI, and embed? And if so: do we care enough to burden
>> ourselves with their maintenance?
>>=20
>=20
> I think you just called me "the devil" ;)
>=20
> Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would
> need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD).
> Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and
> while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly
> brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be
> relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner).
>=20
> I'd support it.
>=20

For what it=E2=80=99s worth I don=E2=80=99t think we should stop =
supporting mod_php at this point in time.
I think there are still plenty of situations where this is the easier, =
simpler route to go and quite robust.

Andi