Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74008
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.220.181 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH6fszP0M9oFVs1vhBfHrUB5Su+EpxQ1-Z4e-RsODw32Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6Eh6pXOXyX_pVEm2bcsZtfoLwLND-HeCuk3xMuwpc4xQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLvHLWuA81s-oQY4Q7qydFRgskYDUOL6tSctyoe5Aw1z4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VtgtCBb9miiOUAOZVNGfEt5+BkBLsTO57Aiuvk6JFGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLtojqZZ-5SQSvitNkwL=Knp7NxwKSth3dHYNsFZDcAeRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VrgxCBGbNTpzQTK_TWf4VB4840dBmzraJc8YgORR7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5369CED9.5010001@php.net>
	<4339111475046055305@unknownmsgid>
	<CAH-PCH6fszP0M9oFVs1vhBfHrUB5Su+EpxQ1-Z4e-RsODw32Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:41:04 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLuo37FWy-oAL+KO4_tqS04U=8fVe1eNfDxVJZ8cBP-_jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c361dc5c6e9704f8cd0002
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--001a11c361dc5c6e9704f8cd0002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I recently converted apache2handler to support phpng and it's appeared
significantly slower than FastCGI and FPM.
So I'm even not sure if it makes sense to support it.
Especially, remembering problems with compatibility between mod_php and
mod_perl for example that use the same libraries.

It's just thoughts, I'm not going to remove something :)

Thanks. Dmitry.




On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 7 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=90=D7=99 2014, at 09:13, Sebastian Bergmann <seb=
astian@php.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Playing devil's advocate: does anyone really need SAPIs other than
> > > FastCGI, CLI, and embed? And if so: do we care enough to burden
> > > ourselves with their maintenance?
> > >
> >
> > I think you just called me "the devil" ;)
> >
> > Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would
> > need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD).
> > Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and
> > while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly
> > brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be
> > relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner).
> >
> > I'd support it.
> >
> > Zeev
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
> You forgot fpm and phpdbg from that list.
> A little bit offtopic, but I think it would be nice if we could have some
> pecl-like infrastructure to host and install 3rd party sapis without the
> need to bundle them with the core.
>
> ps: maybe something like https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D66589 could be
> also considered then.
>
> --
> Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>

--001a11c361dc5c6e9704f8cd0002--