Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:74004 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31414 invoked from network); 7 May 2014 08:55:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2014 08:55:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.45 mail-qg0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.45] ([209.85.192.45:63199] helo=mail-qg0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/02-17246-3E4F9635 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 04:55:00 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z60so709713qgd.32 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 01:54:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MLz6o0mTIZZBCJVUV2p0jxM90hSbtPUng3xCix7qICs=; b=pjVM3bUNkPoYgPcX9AgTXiJv1Dhgkc2azw4RmzCSd4y0lZJIGwnB4wAai8pU6K7jS2 TQ/bBuy9G3hUfyVB8zwDbkZhCFNMhyQ1mBB1K+cN8ELCD820OPfMNUs0jd+vOQBnOYeL 7cxhgBTC6cI94qyzlmWI7Yi3ewfz9IJWnfgCLKXEF0zStYEjB+0g2ZKDjzc/GOjVCxQu hrk4MFRJaIOnc9k8hbg/KlXuYvYrmYxKFqWIG3M7p4i2L6aRlhDwbDTpPsFDizaUEerg OHGu6wSY4VkJyG8WT0E/2Hd1xenyhfb/kQ8/1xhm6K1oGJL8Blmf404Ua5bV5pGNNllQ 4+IA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.95.35 with SMTP id h32mr14716885qge.12.1399452896700; Wed, 07 May 2014 01:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 01:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:54:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [phpng] naming From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, would it be possible to "clean up" the naming while being at it? I would prefer longer but clearer/less confusing names rather than trying to reduce the type strokes. For example: ZVAL_ARR() > ZVAL_ARRAY ZVAL_NEW_ARR() > ZVAL_NEW_ARRAY (btw, ZVAL_NEW_ARRAY is wrongly documented in the wiki draft, section about arrays) Other engine's APIs use full names, to go back and forth between these convention is error prone and not too clean. Thoughts? Yes, it is a detail, but better to fix this now than latter :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org