Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73940
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.212.176 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6vvP0zQjrOOWrrcwJAVW7UFEnx4tRzk+ZE4S5vf3d67A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6Eh6pXOXyX_pVEm2bcsZtfoLwLND-HeCuk3xMuwpc4xQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLvHLWuA81s-oQY4Q7qydFRgskYDUOL6tSctyoe5Aw1z4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VtgtCBb9miiOUAOZVNGfEt5+BkBLsTO57Aiuvk6JFGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLtojqZZ-5SQSvitNkwL=Knp7NxwKSth3dHYNsFZDcAeRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6VrgxCBGbNTpzQTK_TWf4VB4840dBmzraJc8YgORR7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLtT_wzVsv+p=m7vwU72XsAOi6yTndsUak57nd-MDudFZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6vvP0zQjrOOWrrcwJAVW7UFEnx4tRzk+ZE4S5vf3d67A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 10:25:02 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLu-xD00mQN4QzsRMdnT5t2KU8EKOjejMjx30wYtp50NnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043893edd9c77f04f8b54e9e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--f46d043893edd9c77f04f8b54e9e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> > int64 proposal is still in draft for very long time.
>
> Sorry, but it was proposed and rejected because of the changes were
> too big for the 5.x serie. It has been said, as arguments for the no,
> that it would not be a problem for php 6. We are so far.
>

I was never glad with size_t string lengths and told about it.


>
> > Do you provide support for all other unrelated proposals when you offer
> your
> > own?
>
> I do not understand the question, what do you mean?
>

I mean that when you develop something big, you have to be concentrated on
the goals you are going to solve and not on compatibility with others
proposals.


>
> However, about support, we do offer support for almost every proposal,
> be for testing, build fixes, etc. Pro actively in most cases, whether
> it is in our priorities list or not. My reasoning here is pretty
> simple, a stable PHP, for all supported platform or configuration is
> critical for the success of PHP. Cooperation too.
>
> > Lets think how to integrate them. I propose doing it in two steps
> (measuring
> > the performance and memory consumption difference).
> > If the degradation is going to be invisible, I won't object.
>
> The numbers are available already, using master and 5.5-5.6. We
> obviously do not have numbers using your patch but I do not think the
> delta will be any different.
>

phpng completely changes zval structure and reduces overhead of some
subsystems, so the numbers might be different.

Thanks. Dmitry.


>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
>

--f46d043893edd9c77f04f8b54e9e--