Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73909
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 74.125.82.174 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5367A75D.2010504@cubiclesoft.com>
References: <CA+9eiLtKFMWn7AXyS3_fni1Dyerx3DUW7imZ08P9gLr_FY=TaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<139CBA89-9FBD-44E9-A4FC-5539F02943BC@googlemail.com>
	<5367A75D.2010504@cubiclesoft.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 21:59:25 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLvi0XC-MqeTc1venUDdMYsyjR6bQYG4FteMOsgKOua+JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Hruska <thruska@cubiclesoft.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043893ed58868504f8aae44f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--f46d043893ed58868504f8aae44f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

static HTML is served by web server and it's irrelevant to PHP performance.

Thanks. Dmitry.


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Thomas Hruska <thruska@cubiclesoft.com>wrot=
e:

> On 5/5/2014 7:07 AM, Kevin Ingwersen wrote:
>
>> Now I'm glad to present you a result of our recent four month work. It's=
 a
>>> refactoring of the PHP engine that significantly improves performance,
>>> memory usage and builds a foundation for a lot more future performance
>>> improvements incl. JIT. I'll avoid technical details (more details will
>>> be
>>> published at *http://wiki.php.net/phpng <http://wiki.php.net/phpng>*),
>>> but
>>> in few words - we changed the basement trying to keep most of the
>>> building
>>> unchanged. Right now the new engine already makes *10-30% speedup of
>>> php*not only on benchmarks but on real-life applications as well!
>>>
>>>   *Some benchmarks we ran so far:*
>>>
>>> Wordpress 3.6 =E2=80=93 20.0% gain (253 vs 211 req/sec)
>>>
>>> Drupal 6.1 =E2=80=93 11.7% gain (1770 vs 1585 req/sec
>>>
>>> Qdig =E2=80=93 15.3% gain (555 vs 482 req/sec)
>>>
>>> ZF test app =E2=80=93 30.5% gain (217 vs 166 req/sec)
>>>
>>
> What's the comparison to serving static HTML through PHP (no PHP tags) on
> the same setup?
>
> --
> Thomas Hruska
> CubicleSoft President
>
> I've got great, time saving software that you will find useful.
>
> http://cubiclesoft.com/
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--f46d043893ed58868504f8aae44f--