Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73833 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4101 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2014 18:29:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Apr 2014 18:29:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.115 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.115 smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.115] ([108.166.43.115:33176] helo=smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FC/17-49136-22E9E535 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:29:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2FADA1B93C0; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:29:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id CDAAE1B93BE; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:29:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <535E9E1F.8020308@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:29:51 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: PHP Internals References: <535A13E1.3050106@sugarcrm.com> <535D5E07.4060607@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] CI tests RFC From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Then why do you have as an option in your voting "Revert immediately"? > That should never be happening. Because it is an option, and if we need any of the options then the build is already broken, despite the fact it should not normally happen. Note also "immediately" has built-in delay of 2 days. But if you really don't like the option, don't vote for it - if it has less than 50% of votes, it will not be accepted. However, in that case, the question remains what to do with such commits. Having RM fix everything may not be an option - the RM may not have time, and may not have expertise or platform to fix a particular part. So what would we do instead? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227