Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73811 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53585 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2014 09:57:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Apr 2014 09:57:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.171 mail-qc0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.171] ([209.85.216.171:49453] helo=mail-qc0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/72-34885-6F28B535 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 05:57:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c9so5122652qcz.30 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 02:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OQxlB6fHvScyTtKxiuzfqL1j9Gku7QY3Ac8qF+hzD8o=; b=0Q8/jM+kTRJNenNlaV0qr1Wlq0lUY9OCQlaq6qqn+H1nILi2W6f6yABECo2bBGDpkg P97eIaUqZuWSEvHxtRhlr3hXMt/xXAoqB1ZKOOAfzws49f3Dr4mURidErig6ACQgrPI+ mzFVajiXxtD8arBfBzaadKje62FyShCa+C6nlbycg3HgVMWpy7ubd5ZEdlCsYMDQz+T5 8kJXgTxPdauK2MuLZuZ4nwUWAioQuzig4EAfEKXEy7fJrLFLVbk8LCWBwkMa66oa2psv PX80kFL05ezoNQYbbc3+QrsK8wvoyZeJxwgcimQEuzJBnZtaKbdU7XxvA/Hh0URkdIE8 lApA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.176.72 with SMTP id bd8mr18412340qcb.12.1398506227609; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 02:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.231 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 02:57:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <535A13E1.3050106@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Internals , Stas Malyshev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] CI tests RFC From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> I'd like to propose the CI tests RFC for the vote. Please vote at: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/travis_ci >> >> The vote is planned to close on May 5. If you have any questions, >> please contact me. > > I have a comment (not specifically to you). We can't seriously be > suggesting that RMs can just revert commits. This is a really rude thing > to do in an open source project. We're doing this for fun, and people > immediately reverting your commits takes (more) fun out of it. - review - ask for fix - revert I do not see what is rude here. However not fixing a patch within a couple of days (as in commit and run), after other has reported issues, is actually rude. This procedure should have happened long time ago already, at least for stable branches. I would go even one step further, only allow RMs to cherry pick patches and let devs commit to dev branches, be master or next patches release for stable dev branches. Doing so will allow much faster security releases for example and avoid last minutes patches breaking a release. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org