Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73801 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11451 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2014 18:41:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Apr 2014 18:41:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.75 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.75 smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.75] ([108.166.43.75:47897] helo=smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/A0-04819-D4CAA535 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:41:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8B2AB1E9907; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:41:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPA id 3BBF91E98D2; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:41:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com Received: from Stass-MacBook-Pro.local ([UNAVAILABLE]. [74.85.23.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.0.24); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:41:14 GMT Message-ID: <535AAC49.9050004@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:41:13 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <535A13E1.3050106@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] CI tests RFC From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Would be nice if we could also create some policy regarding the usage of > XFAILs (when should be a failing test marked as XFAIL, should we add the > tests from the open bugreports as XFAIL by default, whose responsibility > is to make sure that it will be fixed eventually, etc.). I agree. I didn't get into this but it definitely makes sense to have some rules there. > I would also like to extend the current travis config a bit (we could > have more exts, more axes for stuff like ts/nts builds, enable debug > builds, so memory leaks are also triggering the test failures, etc.), You're more than welcome :) I've planned to get to some of it next - i.e. going through the list of exts and see which ones we can support on Travis - but any help would be great. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227