Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73743 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90627 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2014 23:56:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Apr 2014 23:56:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.75 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.75 smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.75] ([108.166.43.75:32798] helo=smtp75.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B1/C0-19366-FAE54535 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:56:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8101C1E8754; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:56:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id AADBD1E86C6; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:56:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53545EA8.2020703@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:56:24 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Internals CC: Pierre Joye , Julien Pauli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: bug 50444 (PDO-ODBC on 64-bit) From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! There's a bug #50444 (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50444) regarding PDO-ODBC types with 64-bit builds. Looks like we are using wrong types in a couple of places. I've merged the patch for 5.6, but I'm not sure what to do with 5.5 and maybe 5.4. The thing is technically it's structure change which may break BC. OTOH, the old way didn't seem to work on 64-bit anyway. So, I wonder what is the status of our 64-bit support - e.g., I see we don't even have official windows build for 64-bit and 5.4, so it may not make sense to put it in 5.4, but what about 5.5? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227