Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73553 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35584 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2014 09:15:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Apr 2014 09:15:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.160.181 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.181 mail-yk0-f181.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.181] ([209.85.160.181:40016] helo=mail-yk0-f181.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 34/13-15417-3962D335 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:14:59 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 131so1270316ykp.26 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:14:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=L9elCJi8cmboc+QFFHhye1NbllYBzyvgvysAH2Ww5Y4=; b=fa7JWXMBSWK8r/Se2ZqO7Z3xZiGSCU/WcVwdNP69E+qpSNx9TKofu9Dx8ERNy5EEeo 6kybRurAV4/e1ai7PwYPxyGYaqr7V2UIl2heYi/M3F6T5J2C1XwH3Fc7fk40mr+bG0ia Bvzq+6a2EXClmc+VifuZmi0U/qNKAdJY2RpA4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L9elCJi8cmboc+QFFHhye1NbllYBzyvgvysAH2Ww5Y4=; b=JTwWjgVddclyKp3HLi4+LjHXW4jkuG8KvWKuxSNs8TKb1kS1NAX4oh7MGsG55u/SxD gwuAFDkOzLGd+db+3oRFDn4ONRmgb9oYjcS2A19AX5XF2IjdU4v3HAH6hz9I50GA2aJP ELwYTFOs4e81pSaOujwDinpcCzPwNzHJUftGPcJP4M5GnKrMDkQ3K3GBzhUwALSTst7T cvpS+9x/0c/KGzhQxQBSbNYMjHKOwuj6GJw1BmKmIGTmdXLvxc9xb0SrvlUsi/BXR5PJ YQxUnVx0QUst7MRrBdt7cxdqzlElL2gjID2qpFAL8Pq4mjnIuFMsRpB4ha7JZ1tLRLuu EGcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl6Q4C78RAMhzFKC3wN4NxeCh6lkNgv1hPfUPmBchYxOgD5DQ25faCKAjJVU4K+ZoRyOHRR MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.19.99 with SMTP id m63mr58605yhm.134.1396516496108; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.188.139 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 02:14:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <010e01cf4788$05f3c5a0$11db50e0$@devtemple.com> <01c801cf47c0$59acbf20$0d063d60$@devtemple.com> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:14:55 +0300 Message-ID: To: Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: Julien Pauli , Bill Salak , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] session_start(), read_only, lazy_write; Take 2 From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Andrey Andreev wrote: > Hi, > > Yasuo, I don't agree with one bit of what you're saying here, so I > won't even bother replying ... this argument is getting us nowhere. > > I'd like to get this into voting now and I just need to know 1 thing, > is 'read_only' being renamed to 'read_and_close' or not? If it's being > renamed anyway, I'd rather not include it in the RFC. > > Cheers, > Andrey. I guess this commit answers my question: https://github.com/yohgaki/php-src/commit/9ba96e6eb21bb52d7bda5279381911e3a75c3497 I'll remove that part of the RFC and move it to a vote shortly. Cheers, Andrey.