Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73499 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37412 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2014 09:53:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Apr 2014 09:53:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.176 mail-yk0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.176] ([209.85.160.176:59178] helo=mail-yk0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 35/00-37046-99C8A335 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 04:53:29 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 19so7144985ykq.7 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:53:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Da9zk9b47SHvXDgNPoJgYuGD6tePN8CsGlfqDV0jhvY=; b=fLHMLU9Dw+x9j4No7h1WyZORVZhrCppRms31mf9lJZ/UD2rr65DyH6Dj5pLNwfJqvK +hKW9ItdyNI9V6CjdFzlTM4XHBUaNjg+aeQtoRUOGymxNxTZfuz8r4DYBEzkMIgC4aSm l3dIH8wMFVpVwpRO52N48S6jdoVZtP1Kslnfk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Da9zk9b47SHvXDgNPoJgYuGD6tePN8CsGlfqDV0jhvY=; b=TujfeoTnGsIuH6uoiU8e1D+JbZszSjDPaqD2GiWpVV3RVn6aEnsZYamkwZR8H9lmaU RWKUrhYD28kJJq30afZITxG75ANazEkkWG3bhuDlM91qVx3Hj5f/aTG2gfKNTHcChBUj kwuCeOCSu+Ew0dIJG0cIKWtTKEb4blkAtWdF50JaLLL2UiyU2IPZIXpEI3PboYOhtEmC oB6QVY+I/j4Bq47tzgo0JhZuZJ/HZt2ZbQtUcN6MjdK/27enwCR/vJzgSm5sJrQJVufN 80bHP/m/3bKhCGMg/OP+irJwTr6pKG8Yyz4vLpaWxXvnB5WCR6MaqI9yYE4xCZsWdPDC SiSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmMISH3Xsek32rn8TNAxbbZkZ86yDL2zfsVl4flhU2fUEfl4q/iOE9tm3MUZD2UhyK1tRh+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.90.225 with SMTP id e61mr42126432yhf.15.1396346004701; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.188.139 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 02:53:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <010e01cf4788$05f3c5a0$11db50e0$@devtemple.com> <01c801cf47c0$59acbf20$0d063d60$@devtemple.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:53:24 +0300 Message-ID: To: Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: Julien Pauli , Bill Salak , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] session_start(), read_only, lazy_write; Take 2 From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi, Yasuo, I don't agree with one bit of what you're saying here, so I won't even bother replying ... this argument is getting us nowhere. I'd like to get this into voting now and I just need to know 1 thing, is 'read_only' being renamed to 'read_and_close' or not? If it's being renamed anyway, I'd rather not include it in the RFC. Cheers, Andrey.