Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73460
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 43491 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2014 07:35:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Mar 2014 07:35:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.52 mail-la0-f52.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.52] ([209.85.215.52:53617] helo=mail-la0-f52.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id D4/D1-31219-82625335 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 02:35:06 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ec20so3441262lab.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=YqxSY7JWaYB8uuUzIlmPIgCdd2IV0P5M9XGKOh2V6eA=;
        b=P0GNPXIyLtk/B4pqMe/qV7/e4eEJ2xE387L+979CwblOiN2vTCgJQbDmTKrx9Jhglk
         2YTx1pfviyM2vvuBkgPIMjzn+P5iZl7cEtPLDd2iIOE0pSIDhKSSxeVPgS+DwtNZh9k4
         h0MtzswdRa7tqveYGicwg/NbkWG4hFs9/HlDB2L9sUSCvIYFI5wtCNRTvDcKQ3vG9xBu
         m0xdnIMHDpfYODWJFiLML1IMIxKlAK6xGsMNSOI5adt8tUYTlpLne60OGkspjBRFDDbY
         f2xqvy63Kgdv+SHYBFMnO4xOdj6Nd3ojqJJIb2lcL0IHBZ441X9zWcazGw+6y4reEg4k
         noGg==
X-Received: by 10.112.205.35 with SMTP id ld3mr4237299lbc.1.1395992102157;
 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.205.73 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMUwpuRH-cQ9fasUyOft5C7JRi5N=6szwDV5inf+wNi-eAC2iA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPhkiZyFHshFc56UEHiDFK9k801ztno+xoS82Yf6qAcwiRPg1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <010e01cf4788$05f3c5a0$11db50e0$@devtemple.com> <CAPhkiZx8DuDPfks-RNNNunHsjso-9KuwRBor8TjRaK3E10qUiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <01c801cf47c0$59acbf20$0d063d60$@devtemple.com> <CAPhkiZwNywUi_LjOcTmB_aDONHcmpHFtExW6h+S4yYHf4ypitQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZwPBoN+Y+gyTXZB68HTfYkA5eZ-yn_=2FMvir+oFza5TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMUwpuRH-cQ9fasUyOft5C7JRi5N=6szwDV5inf+wNi-eAC2iA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:34:22 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GpW9b27gJSIpNI6K6e_aA0K27bE
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXagLgoY_UnurRc3pW80dSyWk-gdZ8aC8qk1pfMpgHo71g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>
Cc: Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net>, Bill Salak <bill@devtemple.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d8645bc33e04f5a5bd7b
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] session_start(), read_only, lazy_write; Take 2
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a11c3d8645bc33e04f5a5bd7b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Julien,

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote:

> > In order to avoid further arguments about whether a separate function
> > for read-and-close is better or not, I've added an alternative
> > proposal - to rename the option to 'read_close' or 'read_and_close'.
> > After all, the most important thing is that it's not 'read_only'.
>
>
> I agree "read_and_close" is much better discribing what it really does , so
> I prefer it.


I'm not sure if it's good to have "and" or not, but I'm OK with or without
"and".

Should I change it now?
I mean in my github repo.
I haven't committed the RFC patch yet.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a11c3d8645bc33e04f5a5bd7b--