Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73424 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34475 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2014 13:09:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2014 13:09:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain hoa-project.net from 95.130.10.56 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 95.130.10.56 host1.ip6-networks.net Received: from [95.130.10.56] ([95.130.10.56:48795] helo=host1.ip6-networks.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/F0-29088-91081335 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:09:45 -0500 Received: from Hwhost2.local (184-175.106-92.cust.bluewin.ch [92.106.175.184]) by host1.ip6-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9F8760821 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:09:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53318014.1090803@hoa-project.net> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:09:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <532FF7B9.5040700@hoa-project.net> <5330582B.1020604@hoa-project.net> <5330661B.80202@garfieldtech.com> <5330E334.7060109@gmail.com> <53313EE6.4000806@hoa-project.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Specification From: ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net ("Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa") On 25/03/2014 13:52, David Muir wrote: > On 25/03/2014, at 7:31 PM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote: > >> I am not sure to understand your proposal well, but instead of producing a full complete specification at first, we should focus on important features than other implementations do not support. Typically, the fact the `php` binary reads from its stdin is missing most of the time. >> >> I imagine to start the specification at different levels: >> >> * the syntax, which is not easy since PHP grammars is ambigious but it's feasible in a reasonable time, >> * the semantics, very very important, it will describe how data are represented, objects etc., how they behaves, it will clarify a lot of things >> * the tool, i.e. the PHP architecture through SAPI, one of the most clever feature of PHP, >> * the extension, how are they split in different directories, how to load them etc. (still from the user point of view) >> * then the standard library, which includes ext/core, ext/standard, ext/stream etc. >> >> The goal is not, at first, to specify the behavior of all functions. This would be totally crazy. PHP has a big tests suite to check that. Before, the most important thing (for me) is to specify the langage (syntax, semantics and tool). This is a good start and a nice task since types, auto-boxing, generators etc., will be described in those parts. >> > > I don't think the SAPI and extension parts should be part of a language specification. To me, those are implementation concerns. Yes maybe. But it must be specified that PHP works behind a FastCGI server, and how variables and environment from the server and the system is set. > Language should be concerned with syntax, semantics and standard libraries. Certainly. -- Ivan Enderlin Developer of Hoa http://hoa-project.net/ PhD. student at DISC/Femto-ST (Vesontio) and INRIA (Cassis) http://disc.univ-fcomte.fr/ and http://www.inria.fr/ Member of HTML and WebApps Working Group of W3C http://w3.org/