Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73423 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32659 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2014 12:55:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2014 12:55:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.171 mail-yk0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.171] ([209.85.160.171:48489] helo=mail-yk0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/90-29088-8AC71335 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:55:04 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q9so1019163ykb.2 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 05:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ASGvBcFoUqISUt++UskJGc1J376CbHbzsNzWz4RDueY=; b=ELGtAlyFIoFBHW6tpDZiXbXYj1lsQB/WC8obwJkQESs0Uv1w5LlF059PC7NgqlmWiY GuBc8dwpHnbRHkTIhgdQnw2w+Sk6T+bH9SG+tSvm1UkVMxj9qBxXKfYNTniRRVm8u3l2 6vD84R5tw5XONk4jKIJywba6Z2UXv6TSVSPbc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ASGvBcFoUqISUt++UskJGc1J376CbHbzsNzWz4RDueY=; b=XsBvv9KtUAu3EP3KJNBiKJcpWXPVyx10pZiIS+hlyKGHXMCDQi2y31RYPhx6oVS9Cj fICVAxRzrBfeRdg0iF1s6qa2lpmeQmHTR+DCn+ibnALIxO0E0SX3dnk6hCOz5Jy9nvUU Y1oCwoH7sHcMGViVOmN5pO/wqSbn48CItKmD8lMlo9NKAkBI+EIjiZEuzmK7FXYItbeC SYJsI+9luYgyFrdcTZ6pu07BS0u1TBRGi7E5NBmnh/KDoh6XBYksN2BCbNEtUv70lzUW AFqbQIQVDwWFM3QfcN78sO1Z48wGP7hKuWLUko4QOizMtaq/pNh7cWDgX0TdaqOjNs13 EZ7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7Dp71vFhstSMXmwgL1dkslo2GPgbQ7osWbPexYKKlHxAa6QnJMeHcjWi8iKlj0r91PS0J MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.71.100 with SMTP id q64mr1533705yhd.133.1395752101795; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 05:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.188.139 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 05:55:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <010e01cf4788$05f3c5a0$11db50e0$@devtemple.com> <01c801cf47c0$59acbf20$0d063d60$@devtemple.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:55:01 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bill Salak Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] session_start(), read_only, lazy_write; Take 2 From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi, In order to avoid further arguments about whether a separate function for read-and-close is better or not, I've added an alternative proposal - to rename the option to 'read_close' or 'read_and_close'. After all, the most important thing is that it's not 'read_only'. Cheers, Andrey.