Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73343 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35741 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2014 19:57:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Mar 2014 19:57:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:36090] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B1/D0-33112-1384B235 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:57:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3F5382E002B; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:57:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id C2B952E001A; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:57:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <532B482F.90207@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:57:35 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki , Pierre Joye CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <5329E37C.5000106@sugarcrm.com> <532A43C5.309@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Secure session_regenerate_id() From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Anyway, I don't want to write code that wouldn't be accepted. > I think "serializer wrapper" might be alternative choice. It works as > follows. As a PECL extension that provides configurable serializer option - sure, why not. As the part of the core - I don't see common enough use case. If this extension proves popular and everybody would be using it, we can merge it into core then. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227